Indoor, Outdoor & Kids' Trampolines

Separation Of Church And State Gets Hurt On The Playground


TODAY CHURCHES ACROSS AMERICA
CELEBRATED A NEW SUPREME COURT RULING THAT WOULD OPEN THE WAY FOR SOME TAXPAYER MONEY TO GO TO
CHURCH PROJECTS. TODAY WE WILL TELL YOU ABOUT ONE IN
PARTICULAR, THE TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH. WE WANT TO START FROM
THE BEGINNING AND SHOW YOU THE BATTLE THEY WAGED. THEY WANTED TO RUBBERIZE IT FOR SAFETY
REASONS. AS WE KNOW IT IS REALLY ROUGH ON CHRISTIANS
IN AMERICA. JOHN
ROBERTS SAID THIS. I BELIEVE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A PERSON TO NOT BE DECEPTIVE WHEN THEY USE
THE PHRASE ODIOUS TO THE CONSTITUTION. BUT HE IS A FAN OF
THIS. SONIA SOTOMAYOR READ ALOUD HER DISSENTING OPINION. THAT IS
A GREAT TURN OF PHRASE THERE. THIS MONEY WILL NOW EFFECTIVELY, RATHER THAN HAVING
TO RAISE AND SPEND IT SELF, EVEN IF THE SCHOOL AND THE PLAYGROUND
IS NOT A PART OF WORSHIP, THAT IS A FINANCIAL BENEFIT GOING
TO THAT CHURCH. BEFORE I GET TO MY ACTUAL
COMMENT, LET’S HAVE FUN AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE WORD RUBBERIZE
IS FUNNY. IT’S VERY SIMPLE TO SAY OTHER SCHOOLS ARE GETTING
PLAYGROUND, WHY CAN’T THE CHURCH? BUT WE DON’T SPEND
TAXPAYER MONEY ON CHURCHES OR TEMPLES OR MOSQUES. OF COURSE
THE NATIONAL EXTENSION OF THAT IS THE PLAYGROUND, OR THE DOOR. SO OBVIOUSLY YOU SEE THE PROBLEM HERE WHICH IS THAT IT SHOULD
APPLY TO ALL RELIGIONS, AND THAT IS WHERE SOME CONSERVATIVES MIGHT GO ñ MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTERS ARE
PROBABLY VERY EXCITED ABOUT THIS. THIS IS A MESS. THERE IS
NO END TO THAT. EVERYONE ELSE GETS FEATURES- SO JUST REMEMBER
THE PRINCIPLES, IF YOU HAVE ANY AND YOU SHOULD APPLY IT EQUALLY
DOT IN THIS CASE, THERE IS A REASON WHY THE FOUNDING FATHERS
SET THIS REPUBLIC UP IN A WAY THAT SAID THAT WE SHALL NOT MIX STATE AND CHURCH. YES, IT MAY
SEEM SILLY TO DENY THOSE POOR KIDS A NICE RUBBERIZED
PLAYGROUND, BUT IT IS A VERY IMPORTANT PRINCIPLE. IT SET THE PRECEDENT, THAT IS
WHY WE ARE CONCERNED AND WHY THE PEOPLE THAT ARE HAPPY TODAY ARE
HAPPY. THEY ARE NOT HAPPY BECAUSE OF SOME RUBBERIZATION
GOING ON. THERE IS A FOOTNOTE THAT THIS
ATTEMPTS TO SAY THIS A SPECIFIC. SO THEORETICALLY THIS DOES NOT NEED TO SET A PRECEDENT. I’LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT. THAT IS INTERESTING. SOME OF
THE SO-CALLED LIBERAL JUSTICES ALSO VOTED FOR THIS. ONE THEORY IS, THEY DID SO THAT SO THEY CAN
GET THAT FOOTNOTE PUT IN. IF THAT IS TRUE, WHY ARE ALL THE
RELIGIOUS CONSERVATIVES IN THE COUNTRY CELEBRATING TODAY? THEY
THINK WE JUST TRICKED THE LIBERALS, THAT FOOTNOTE DOESN’T MEAN ANYTHING. AND THEN ALL THEY
HAVE TO DO IS GET FIVE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES TO QUOTE THE CASE LATER AND THEY
ARE DONE WITH IT. IS THERE ANY CHANCE WE CAN
TREAT CONSERVATIVES INTO BEING AGAINST THE SAYING THAT THEY RUBBERIZING OF A
PLAYGROUND IS PART OF A CONTINUED WAS A VACATION OF AMERICAN CHILDREN? WHEN I GREW
UP I DIDN’T NEED NO RUBBER. IT’S A BAD DAY FOR PEOPLE ñ
IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR OWN RELIGION AND PROTECTING IT, YOU WOULD NOT BE IN FAVOR OF THIS. OBVIOUSLY IF YOU CARE ABOUT AN IRRATIONAL RULE OF LAW YOU
SHOULD BE CONCERNED AND YOU WOULD NOT TRUST A CONSERVATIVE
WHEN HE SAYS IT ONLY APPLIES TO THIS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *